Screpy vs Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool: which SEO tool fits your team | SEO Tools Directory
Tool comparison
Screpy vs Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool: which SEO tool fits your team?
Both tools graded on the same fifteen criteria. The verdict lists the criteria where one tool leads the other by two points or more.
Verdict
Choose Screpy when
Technical SEO matters to you. Strong explicit technical suite spanning audits, crawling, status/redirects/canonicals, broken links, image SEO, Core Web Vitals, PageSpeed, uptime, and index status.
AI-search / GEO matters to you. Tracks AI mentions, citations, sources, prompts, and competitor share of voice across monitored AI answers.
Keyword research quality for SEO content matters to you. Provides ideas, intent, volume, CPC, trends, and content-brief linkage; official detail is positive but not evidence of breadth comparable to specialist databases.
Content execution matters to you. Generates queued article outlines/first drafts and Markdown for review, but does not claim autonomous publishing or optimization execution.
Verdict
Choose Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool when
Estimated customer scale matters to you. The company publishes a first-party 1,000+ customer/agency-and-brand claim, but no exact customer count.
Aggregates SEO source data for reporting, but is not a full SEO research suite.
The SEO reporting page says it connects Search Console, Ahrefs, Semrush, GA4 and other SEO platforms and reports on rankings, traffic and backlinks: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Keyword research quality for SEO content
Discovery
How well the tool identifies, qualifies, clusters, and prioritizes keywords specifically for SEO content creation.
Screpy
3/5
Provides ideas, intent, volume, CPC, trends, and content-brief linkage; official detail is positive but not evidence of breadth comparable to specialist databases.
Screpy says Keyword Research finds ideas, reviews intent, and connects demand with pages, articles, and campaigns: https://screpy.com/feature/keyword-research/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
1/5
Weak, source-dependent keyword visibility; no native keyword-discovery workflow is described.
The official Semrush connector lists search terms and keyword-position metrics, but presents them as imported Semrush data: https://whatagraph.com/integrations/semrush
Content execution
Execution
How well the tool helps produce, optimize, or operationalize SEO content.
Screpy
2/5
Generates queued article outlines/first drafts and Markdown for review, but does not claim autonomous publishing or optimization execution.
AI Article Generator creates drafts from titles/briefs and requires review before publishing: https://screpy.com/feature/ai-article-generator/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
0/5
No content briefs, writing, optimization recommendations or publishing are claimed.
The SEO product page describes connecting, blending, reporting, analyzing and sharing SEO data, with no content execution feature: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Context gathering
Grounding
How well the tool gathers the business, competitor, SEO, internal, third-party, and custom API context needed for differentiated recommendations and content.
Screpy
3/5
Uses crawled pages, Search Console data, ranking context, and project-level website data to prioritize opportunities.
Quick Wins is described as turning crawl and Search Console data into prioritized technical, content, and ranking opportunities: https://screpy.com/features/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
2/5
Good cross-channel and custom-data context for reporting, not broad web/context research.
Whatagraph says users can blend Search Console with GA4, Ahrefs backlink data and cross-channel insights: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
AI-search / GEO
Visibility
How directly the tool helps teams improve visibility in AI answer engines and citation-oriented search journeys.
Screpy
3/5
Tracks AI mentions, citations, sources, prompts, and competitor share of voice across monitored AI answers.
AI Visibility feature explicitly lists mentions, citations, sources, prompts, and competitor share of voice: https://screpy.com/feature/ai-visibility/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
0/5
No generative-engine optimization or AI-search visibility workflow is claimed.
The SEO page's AI claims are report creation, summaries and metric chat, not optimization for generative engines: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
GEO readiness
Visibility
How ready the tool is for generative engine optimization: answer-engine visibility, citation likelihood, AI-search prompt surfaces, and content structures that AI systems can use.
Screpy
2/5
Has AI visibility monitoring and an SEO MCP, but official pages do not establish broad autonomous optimization for generative search.
AI Visibility monitors AI answers and SEO MCP exposes workflows to assistants: https://screpy.com/feature/ai-visibility/ and https://screpy.com/feature/seo-mcp/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
0/5
No GEO (generative-engine optimization) readiness or citation/answer visibility feature is described.
The official SEO product page focuses on conventional SEO data sources and reporting and does not claim GEO readiness: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Technical SEO
Diagnostics
How strong the tool is for crawling, audits, indexability, metadata, status codes, and technical site health.
Screpy
5/5
Strong explicit technical suite spanning audits, crawling, status/redirects/canonicals, broken links, image SEO, Core Web Vitals, PageSpeed, uptime, and index status.
Official feature directory documents the technical modules and their functions: https://screpy.com/features/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
1/5
Limited technical signal through imported Search Console/index coverage data; no audit/crawl system.
The Google Search Console integration explicitly lists index coverage and average position among the data it analyzes: https://whatagraph.com/integrations/google-search-console
Publishing workflow
Operations
How well the tool moves work into CMS, publishing, approvals, or automated production workflows.
Screpy
1/5
Supports reviewed Markdown draft output, but no official native CMS publishing workflow is documented.
The article feature says users review Markdown output before publishing: https://screpy.com/feature/ai-article-generator/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
0/5
Automated report delivery is not an SEO content-publishing workflow.
Whatagraph automates marketing report creation and delivery; its official pages do not document CMS content publishing or editorial approvals. https://whatagraph.com/
Measurement & tracking
Measurement
How well the tool monitors rankings, content performance, visibility, or ongoing SEO progress.
Screpy
4/5
Offers rank, map, AI visibility, Core Web Vitals, PageSpeed, uptime, Search Console, analytics, and reports over time.
Monitoring and reporting modules are listed with trend/monitoring functions: https://screpy.com/features/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
4/5
Strong reporting and monitoring layer across rankings, traffic, backlinks and blended marketing data.
The SEO page says it connects SEO platforms, blends their data, generates reports and provides AI answers/summaries; GSC also exposes impressions, clicks, CTR and average rank: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/integrations/google-search-console
Team collaboration
Operations
How well the tool fits multi-person workflows, agencies, approvals, handoffs, and repeatable processes.
Screpy
3/5
Project workspace, team seats, client/white-label reports, and scheduled delivery support team workflows; no detailed review/approval system is claimed.
Pricing lists team-member quotas and Reports included; Project Workspace and White-label SEO Reports are official features: https://screpy.com/pricing/ and https://screpy.com/features/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
4/5
Strong client-facing collaboration via white labeling, scheduled delivery, live links and shared AI chat.
The SEO page claims white-labeled reports, scheduled email, live links and exports; the MCP page says teams can self-serve plain-language queries: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/mcp
Value accessibility
Buying
How easy it is for a team to reach value relative to pricing, setup complexity, and required expertise.
Screpy
4/5
Transparent low displayed entry price, free trial, and three clear tiers make access relatively straightforward, though key modules are gated.
Pricing shows Pro $6/month, Max $15/month, Ultra $30/month and a 7-day trial: https://screpy.com/pricing/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
2/5
A free trial is advertised, but the current paid offering is demo-led and enterprise-oriented.
The SEO page offers Start free trial, while pricing lists Max from $812/month billed annually and Prime as Custom: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/pricing
Free tools
Buying
How useful the tool is before payment through free tools, free plans, trials, or public utilities.
Screpy
2/5
The official site provides several free standalone SEO tools, but they are separate tools and do not imply full platform access.
Screpy lists Website Analyzer, Google Rank Checker, SEO Report Generator, SERP Competitor Research, and Robots.txt Tester under Free SEO Tools: https://screpy.com/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
0/5
No standalone free SEO tool is claimed; only a trial CTA appears.
The SEO page contains a Start free trial CTA but does not describe a free-forever SEO tool: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Estimated customer scale
Market proof
Estimated customer or user scale based on public claims, with source claims stored separately for auditability.
Screpy
1/5
Official site displays ten named trust logos, but provides no customer count or independently verifiable scale metric.
The homepage trust section names Uber, Philips, FedEx Express, Bosch, Champion, Iconfinder, T-Mobile, Carrefour, Stanley, and Skoda: https://screpy.com/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
3/5
The company publishes a first-party 1,000+ customer/agency-and-brand claim, but no exact customer count.
Whatagraph states it is trusted by 1,000+ marketing agencies and brands around the world: https://whatagraph.com/
Agent readiness level
Automation
How ready the product is to operate as or inside an AI agent workflow, based on tracked subcriteria for autonomy, controls, integrations, memory, and evaluation.
Screpy
3/5
SEO MCP, REST API, AI-assistant integrations, and n8n provide meaningful agent connectivity, but the official material does not demonstrate broad end-to-end agent autonomy.
Screpy documents SEO MCP/API and integrations with ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and n8n: https://screpy.com/feature/seo-mcp/ and https://screpy.com/integrations/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
4/5
MCP is available for governed external AI querying; IQ Agents are still early access and scheduled workflows are described.
The MCP page says it connects Whatagraph to Claude, ChatGPT and MCP-compatible tools, while the IQ Agents page labels the product early access and describes scheduled/triggered work: https://whatagraph.com/mcp ; https://whatagraph.com/agents-waitlist
Ease of use and autonomous level
Automation
How easy it is for a team to reach useful outcomes, and how much work the product can perform autonomously after setup.
Screpy
2/5
Quick Wins and AI-assisted workflows prioritize and draft work, while review and publishing control remain with users.
Quick Wins prioritizes next actions and the article generator requires review, editing, fact-checking, and publishing control: https://screpy.com/features/ and https://screpy.com/feature/ai-article-generator/
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
3/5
High automation for data refresh, report generation and delivery, but agent actions are partly future/early-access.
The SEO page claims automatic connections, AI-built reports, scheduled delivery and AI summaries; the MCP page labels action-taking CREATE as coming soon: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/mcp