Loading page
Tool comparison
Both tools graded on the same fifteen criteria. The verdict lists the criteria where one tool leads the other by two points or more.
Verdict
Verdict
Research depth
Discovery
How well the tool supports keyword, competitor, SERP, backlink, or market research before execution.
AlsoAsked
Strong depth for People Also Ask and intent-map research, but narrower than a full SEO suite with backlinks, crawling, and rank data.
Read the full reviews: AlsoAsked and Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool.
The homepage describes live People Also Ask data, intent clustering by Google, country, city, language, search-depth controls, Deep Search, bulk searches, and a case study using the data for long-tail keyword growth.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Aggregates SEO source data for reporting, but is not a full SEO research suite.
The SEO reporting page says it connects Search Console, Ahrefs, Semrush, GA4 and other SEO platforms and reports on rankings, traffic and backlinks: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Keyword research quality for SEO content
Discovery
How well the tool identifies, qualifies, clusters, and prioritizes keywords specifically for SEO content creation.
AlsoAsked
Strong for question-led keyword discovery and content ideation, especially long-tail and intent expansion.
Public pages show visual graphs of live PAA data, Deep Search returning about 150 questions per query, bulk upload, CSV export, and a Dreams case study citing a 59 percent increase in long-tail keywords.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Weak, source-dependent keyword visibility; no native keyword-discovery workflow is described.
The official Semrush connector lists search terms and keyword-position metrics, but presents them as imported Semrush data: https://whatagraph.com/integrations/semrush
Content execution
Execution
How well the tool helps produce, optimize, or operationalize SEO content.
AlsoAsked
Helpful for planning content, but it does not appear to write, optimize, or publish finished SEO articles natively.
The homepage positions AlsoAsked for understanding users, helpful content, EEAT, and content planning; no public evidence was found for a built-in content editor, article generator, or CMS publishing workflow.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
No content briefs, writing, optimization recommendations or publishing are claimed.
The SEO product page describes connecting, blending, reporting, analyzing and sharing SEO data, with no content execution feature: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Context gathering
Grounding
How well the tool gathers the business, competitor, SEO, internal, third-party, and custom API context needed for differentiated recommendations and content.
AlsoAsked
Good search-intent context from PAA data and location-language targeting, with limited first-party or third-party business context.
AlsoAsked gathers Google PAA questions, supports country, city, language and search depth, stores search history on paid plans, and exposes API/webhook flows; public pages do not show CRM, analytics, support, or internal knowledge ingestion.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Good cross-channel and custom-data context for reporting, not broad web/context research.
Whatagraph says users can blend Search Console with GA4, Ahrefs backlink data and cross-channel insights: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
AI-search / GEO
Visibility
How directly the tool helps teams improve visibility in AI answer engines and citation-oriented search journeys.
AlsoAsked
Relevant to AI-search planning because it maps conversational question paths, but it is not a full AI citation tracking or GEO execution platform.
The homepage says users can map intent for AI and traditional search, improve AI visibility, and map the conversation after an initial prompt; no public evidence was found for AI answer monitoring or citation measurement.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
No generative-engine optimization or AI-search visibility workflow is claimed.
The SEO page's AI claims are report creation, summaries and metric chat, not optimization for generative engines: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
GEO readiness
Visibility
How ready the tool is for generative engine optimization: answer-engine visibility, citation likelihood, AI-search prompt surfaces, and content structures that AI systems can use.
AlsoAsked
Moderate GEO readiness through conversational intent mapping and question coverage for AI-usable content.
AlsoAsked describes AI search as ongoing conversations and helps identify follow-up questions to build into AI content and research processes, but it does not directly publish structured answer assets or monitor LLM citations.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
No GEO (generative-engine optimization) readiness or citation/answer visibility feature is described.
The official SEO product page focuses on conventional SEO data sources and reporting and does not claim GEO readiness: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Technical SEO
Diagnostics
How strong the tool is for crawling, audits, indexability, metadata, status codes, and technical site health.
AlsoAsked
Technical SEO coverage is mostly absent outside search research inputs.
Public pages did not show crawling, indexability audits, status code checks, schema auditing, site health monitoring, or technical remediation workflows.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Limited technical signal through imported Search Console/index coverage data; no audit/crawl system.
The Google Search Console integration explicitly lists index coverage and average position among the data it analyzes: https://whatagraph.com/integrations/google-search-console
Publishing workflow
Operations
How well the tool moves work into CMS, publishing, approvals, or automated production workflows.
AlsoAsked
Export and API surfaces support handoff, but direct CMS publishing or approval workflow is not publicly shown.
Features include PNG export, CSV export, bulk searches, search history, API access, and webhooks, while the public site does not describe native WordPress, Shopify, or editorial publishing destinations.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Automated report delivery is not an SEO content-publishing workflow.
Whatagraph automates marketing report creation and delivery; its official pages do not document CMS content publishing or editorial approvals. https://whatagraph.com/
Measurement & tracking
Measurement
How well the tool monitors rankings, content performance, visibility, or ongoing SEO progress.
AlsoAsked
Limited measurement support through search history and usage stats, not rank or performance tracking.
The pricing page lists 24 hour, 1 month, and 1 year search history by plan, and the homepage publishes aggregate user searches and results; no public rank tracking or traffic analytics module was found.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Strong reporting and monitoring layer across rankings, traffic, backlinks and blended marketing data.
The SEO page says it connects SEO platforms, blends their data, generates reports and provides AI answers/summaries; GSC also exposes impressions, clicks, CTR and average rank: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/integrations/google-search-console
Team collaboration
Operations
How well the tool fits multi-person workflows, agencies, approvals, handoffs, and repeatable processes.
AlsoAsked
Unlimited users on paid plans make team access practical, but public evidence for approvals or workflow roles is limited.
The pricing page lists unlimited users for Basic, Lite, and Pro, but public pages do not show role permissions, briefs, comments, or approval queues.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
Strong client-facing collaboration via white labeling, scheduled delivery, live links and shared AI chat.
The SEO page claims white-labeled reports, scheduled email, live links and exports; the MCP page says teams can self-serve plain-language queries: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/mcp
Value accessibility
Buying
How easy it is for a team to reach value relative to pricing, setup complexity, and required expertise.
AlsoAsked
Accessible pricing and free monthly credits make the tool easy to try for a focused research job.
The pricing page advertises free monthly search credits and paid annual equivalents from $12 per month, with clear credit limits and plan inclusions.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
A free trial is advertised, but the current paid offering is demo-led and enterprise-oriented.
The SEO page offers Start free trial, while pricing lists Max from $812/month billed annually and Prime as Custom: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/pricing
Free tools
Buying
How useful the tool is before payment through free tools, free plans, trials, or public utilities.
AlsoAsked
Meaningful trial access exists through free monthly credits, but heavier exports and API access require paid plans.
The pricing page says non-registered users can trial the product with free monthly search credits, while Deep Search, CSV export, bulk searches, and API access appear on paid tiers.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
No standalone free SEO tool is claimed; only a trial CTA appears.
The SEO page contains a Start free trial CTA but does not describe a free-forever SEO tool: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool
Estimated customer scale
Market proof
Estimated customer or user scale based on public claims, with source claims stored separately for auditability.
AlsoAsked
Strong public usage proof from registered-user, search, and result counters plus recognizable customer logos.
The homepage showed 115,262 registered users, 10,266,677 user searches, 312,207,549 results, and logos including Tripadvisor, Lego, Deloitte, Gymshark, Nerdwallet, Oracle, Indeed, Ikea, Riverside, and KPMG.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
The company publishes a first-party 1,000+ customer/agency-and-brand claim, but no exact customer count.
Whatagraph states it is trusted by 1,000+ marketing agencies and brands around the world: https://whatagraph.com/
Agent readiness level
Automation
How ready the product is to operate as or inside an AI agent workflow, based on tracked subcriteria for autonomy, controls, integrations, memory, and evaluation.
AlsoAsked
Useful inside agentic workflows through API, asynchronous jobs, and webhooks, but it does not appear to autonomously execute SEO changes.
API documentation describes sync and async searches, retrieving results, search history, account credits, and webhooks for search status; the product remains a research data source rather than an autonomous SEO agent.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
MCP is available for governed external AI querying; IQ Agents are still early access and scheduled workflows are described.
The MCP page says it connects Whatagraph to Claude, ChatGPT and MCP-compatible tools, while the IQ Agents page labels the product early access and describes scheduled/triggered work: https://whatagraph.com/mcp ; https://whatagraph.com/agents-waitlist
Ease of use and autonomous level
Automation
How easy it is for a team to reach useful outcomes, and how much work the product can perform autonomously after setup.
AlsoAsked
Easy for focused question research with some automation through bulk and API features, but content strategy and implementation remain manual.
The homepage search flow is simple, pricing exposes bulk and API access on Pro, and docs support webhooks, but users still analyze results and implement content or SEO changes elsewhere.
Whatagraph SEO Reporting Tool
High automation for data refresh, report generation and delivery, but agent actions are partly future/early-access.
The SEO page claims automatic connections, AI-built reports, scheduled delivery and AI summaries; the MCP page labels action-taking CREATE as coming soon: https://whatagraph.com/seo-reporting-tool ; https://whatagraph.com/mcp